
Bob
Kimber & Ted Nugent:
A Comparison


Reviewed by
Kenny Brechner
When two books share as many
themes as Ted Nugent’s Kill It and Grill It and Bob Kimber’s Living
Wild and Domestic, it would be unnatural not to compare them. The role of
hunting in the modern world, its potential to center an individual within the
duality of nature in man and man in nature, to examine the means of providing
what Nugent refers to as "our spiritual barbecue" and Kimber "our
sacred meal," is the centerpiece of these two books.
The differences between these
two avid hunters are fundamental, an intrinsic difference of character which
manifests itself in every element of their style and approach. Nugent, a rock
star who lives in Michigan, has a presence both flamboyant and egocentric.
Kimber, a woodsman, author, and translator from central Maine, is at all times
self amused and incisive. In "A note on style" for example, Nugent
argues that he, Ted Nugent, has succeeded in reinventing and reinvigorating the
English language where prior linguistic innovators such as George Bernard Shaw
and Gertrude Stein failed so badly. Unlike Shaw, whose efforts were a "big
musty flop," Nugent asserts that in his "book-the hard-drivin’,
hard-lovin’, full-throbbin’, high octane,’ deerslayin’, allthings-scarin’,
ballistic guitarboy-Nugetizes it (the English language.)" Kimber, on
the other hand, contents himself with writing in standard English. Kimber’s
prose has the quality of an underground stream whose presence is everywhere
evident but nowhere visible. Smooth and companionable, Kimber demands nothing
while providing a great deal.
Nugent’s idea that his
disavowal of the letter g at the end of a word, along with his embracement of
the suffix age, as in "hornage," "slabbage" and so
forth, represents a genuine literary innovation rather than a monotonous, single
chord exercise of commonly used slang, highlights his premise that continually
broadcasting self importance at a high decibel level transmutes everything it
touches into gold. Nugent himself would recognize the fallacy in his premise
given a musical, rather than literary context, however. A great deal can be done
with three chords in a rock song, one chord can only have one result though.
The idea that self
advertisement is the most effective means of communication is everywhere evident
in Kill it and Grill it. We know Nugent is awesome because he’s
"The Nuge." We know he’s a great cook because he’s "Chef Nuge."
We know he has a tight knit, cohesive family because they are "Tribe Nuge."
We know he loves his mom because she is "Ma Nuge." And we know he
loves his wife because he tells us, beneath a photo of her aiming a bow that
"the mystical flight of her arrow truly turns me on."
In reading Living Wild and
Domestic, the reader becomes aware that Bob Kimber is exceedingly fond of
his wife Rita. There is, however, no single passage that can be cited to
demonstrate Kimber’s affection, the inference is strong because it is
cumulative. The reader also becomes aware that Kimber is a superb preparer of
wild game, though one doubts if he refers to himself, even in private moments,
as Chef Kimbo. Nor does the presumption that the Kimber family doesn’t refer
to itself as Clan Kimbo obstruct the reader’s appreciation of their tight knit
and cohesive nature.
The fundamental purpose, or
complex of purposes of an author is best revealed in their intended, or imagined
audience. Nugent imagines an audience composed of the already sympathetic, the
pre-nugetized that is, and "goofball squawks" whose delusional
fantasies are "like kevlar body armor for the brain." The idea that
the world is composed of two types of people, people who think that Nugent is
awesome, and people who are lame, means that Nugent has no interest in engaging
in genuine argumentation.
Bob Kimber imagines a
spectrum of scepticism and sympathy in his audience, and employs therefore all
his considerable powers of persuasion to engage the reader. In recognizing the
complexities lurking on the edge of his own position Kimber manages to pull his
readers within the scope of his argumentation.
The ungainly aphorisms
("There is no bag limit on happiness....Kill tree-dwelling vermin, remove
PJs, take to flame, chow down. Drive safely.") and questionable recipes
("Coca-Cola Stew...Ted’s Favorite Porkfeast...Sweet, n, Sticky
Rabbit") found throughout Ted Nugent’s Kill if and Grill it, are
not the book’s central problem. The problem is ineffectiveness. Nugent’s
determination to imagine that everyone who isn’t a mirror image of himself is
lame has led him into writing a lame book. In comparing Kimber and Nugent one
does well to reflect that introspection, complexity, and style provide the spice
and the heat of argumentation. And that without them a narrative is nothing but
a festering, unattended carcass left to rot in the field.